HUMAN
Get human eyes on the code AI wrote for you.
Before you ship code an AI wrote, a second opinion from a real engineer catches what the model missed. Humanized Code puts senior human eyes on your repo for a flat $50, and returns written findings plus a fixed quote within 48 hours — no subscription, no sales call, no guessing whether it's safe to launch.
01
Why you want a second opinion before you ship
AI-generated code compiles, passes the happy path, and looks confident — which is exactly the problem. Confidence isn't correctness, and the tools that write fast don't flag what they got wrong.
A senior engineer reads it the way a hiring manager reads a resume: not just does it work, but would a professional have shipped it this way.
02
What a human review actually checks
We read the logic AI wrote, not just the tests it passed: auth boundaries, error handling, data validation, and the edge cases nobody thought to prompt for.
You get a plain-language write-up of what's solid, what's risky, and what needs a human hand before it touches production — plus a fixed quote if you want us to fix what we find.
$50 FLAT — FINDINGS + A FIXED QUOTE IN 48 HOURS
$50
Flat initial review
48h
Written findings + fixed quote
START THE REVIEW
- Is this different from a linter or an AI code reviewer?
- Yes. Automated tools check syntax and style. A human checks whether the code actually does the right thing, safely, in your specific context.
- What kinds of AI-generated code do you review?
- Anything shipped from Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot, Cursor or similar — from a single feature to a whole AI-built app.
- Do you review before or after I ship?
- Either. Most people send it before launch, but a review after something feels off works too — we will tell you what to fix first.